Corrections log
Health publishing has a reproducibility problem and an accountability problem. Wellness Radar keeps a public corrections log so that when we change a claim, retract a recommendation, or update an article in response to new evidence, the change is visible — not buried inside the article.
How this works
When the editorial team materially updates an article — fixing a misattributed citation, correcting a clinical claim, retracting a recommendation, or substantively changing a recommendation tier — we log it here with the date, the article affected, what changed, and why. Routine copy edits and link refreshes are not logged.
If you spot something you believe is wrong, email [email protected] with the article slug and the claim you're flagging. We respond within seven days.
2026
What counts as a correction
- Citation correction — a reference was misattributed, mis-dated, or pointed to the wrong paper.
- Claim correction — a substantive factual claim was wrong (effect size off, mechanism mis-stated, regulatory status wrong).
- Recommendation update — a tier-level recommendation was changed in light of new evidence (e.g. moving a compound from "standard" to "aggressive" or vice versa).
- Retraction — an article was removed or replaced because the underlying evidence base shifted enough that the original framing was no longer defensible.
- Material context addition — a safety caveat, contraindication, or new comorbidity warning was added that materially changes the protocol risk profile.
What doesn't count
Routine copy edits (typos, broken links, formatting fixes), date-of-last-review bumps without substantive changes, and updates to internal navigation are not logged. The article:modified_time meta on each article reflects the most recent review.